Volume 72

Issue 1 – November 2023

Mark Edwin Burge, After FTX: Can the Original Bitcoin Use Case Be Saved?
Lawrence Ponoroff, Let’s Stay Together
Hailey Reed, Cleating Up and Clocking InL A Joint-Employer Approach to Student-Athlete Employee Status
Elizabeth “Libby” Rohr, Accountability for the Ringmaster: The Need for an Encouragement Test Under § 230 to Appropriately Combat Nonconsensual Pornography Websites

Issue 2 – December 2023

James G. Hodge, Jr., Federalism and Liberty: Reaching Constitutional Accord
Rebecca Rosenberg, Bad Apples and Wild Cards: Removal of the Predominant Character Approach from the Foreign Tax Credit Regulations
Makaela Stevens, When the Child Adopts the Parent: Considering Attachment and the Psychological-Parent Doctrine in Kansas Adoptions
Sophia Leonard, No (Individualized Objective) Harm, No Case for Discriminatory Employment Transfer

Issue 3 – March 2024

Jennifer J. Cook; Denitsa R. Mavrova Meinrich, AI-Ready Attorneys: Ethical Obligations and Privacy Considerations in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
J. Haskell Murray, Examining the Restrictions on College Athlete NIL Deals
Vartan Shadarevian; Lloyd Lyall, Modern Antitrust Meets Modern Rulemaking: Evaluating the Potential of FTC Competition Rulemaking
Michael Z. Green, Expanding the Ban on Forced Arbitration to Race Claims
Collin Studer, “The Government is Liable”: Waiving the Federal Government’s Sovereign Immunity Through the Fair Credit Reporting Act

Issue 4 – Symposium Issue

Brandon Weiss, An Affirmative Approach to the Supreme Court’s Major Questions Doctrine & Chevron Skepticism
Stephen Clowney, Nationalize Zoning
Randall K. Johnson, How to Limit the Downstream Costs of Racially Restrictive Covenants

Issue 5 – Kansas Issue

Griffin Albaugh & Sarah Schmitz, The Constitutional Case-or-Controversy Requirement: Expanding Rights to Interlocutory Appeals under K.S.A. Section 60-2012(a)(3)
Hon. Kevin Smith, The Consequences of the Legal Profession’s Mentoring Gap and How to Close It
Emma Leonard, Solitary Confining Rights: Pushing toward a Sandin Baseline for Kansas
Gabrielle Phillips, How Kansas’s Pragmatic Approach to Its Consumer Protection Act Has Paid off: An Unexpected Source of Health Data Privacy

Volume 72 – Editorial Board

The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression, and genetic information in the university’s programs and activities. Retaliation is also prohibited by university policy. The following persons have been designated to handle inquiries regarding the nondiscrimination policies and are the Title IX coordinators for their respective campuses: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity & Access, IOA@ku.edu, Room 1082, Dole Human Development Center, 1000 Sunnyside Ave., Lawrence, KS 66045, 785-864-6414, 711 TTY (for the Lawrence, Edwards, Parsons, Yoder, and Topeka campuses); Director, Equal Opportunity Office, Mail Stop 7004, 4330 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Fairway, KS 66205, 913-588-8011, 711 TTY (for the Wichita, Salina, and Kansas City, Kansas, medical center campuses).