Tag: Coercive Interrogation

Leave a Comment

Updated on November 16, 2024

The “Jigsaw Puzzle” of Determining Law Enforcement Misconduct: The Kansas Supreme Court finds no misconduct where interrogation utilized both the Reid Technique and deception

State v. Garrett, No. 124,329, 2024 WL 4245190 (Kan., Sept. 20, 2024). Author: Alec Nee, Staff Editor   Issue: Are there circumstances in which investigators can use both the Reid Technique and deception during interrogations?  Answer: Yes.  Investigators can use both the Reid …

Continue reading “The “Jigsaw Puzzle” of Determining Law Enforcement Misconduct: The Kansas Supreme Court finds no misconduct where interrogation utilized both the Reid Technique and deception”

Category: Kansas Criminal Procedure Survey Tags: , ,

Follow Us
Follow the Kansas Law Review on Twitter Follow the Kansas Law Review on LinkedIn

The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression, and genetic information in the university’s programs and activities. Retaliation is also prohibited by university policy. The following persons have been designated to handle inquiries regarding the nondiscrimination policies and are the Title IX coordinators for their respective campuses: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity & Access, IOA@ku.edu, Room 1082, Dole Human Development Center, 1000 Sunnyside Ave., Lawrence, KS 66045, 785-864-6414, 711 TTY (for the Lawrence, Edwards, Parsons, Yoder, and Topeka campuses); Director, Equal Opportunity Office, Mail Stop 7004, 4330 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Fairway, KS 66205, 913-588-8011, 711 TTY (for the Wichita, Salina, and Kansas City, Kansas, medical center campuses).