Category: Kansas Criminal Procedure Survey

Quantity v. The Right Quantity: A Greater Quantity of Contraband Than a Lesser Charge Demands Can Support the Lesser Charge

Alex Speakar, Staff Editor State v. Scheuerman, No. 122,253 (Kan. Jan. 14, 2022). Issue: Under K.S.A. § 21-5705(a)(1) and (d)(3)(B), different amounts of methamphetamine are required for different levels of felony charges.  When the statute’s plain language requires …

Challenging Prior Convictions in Kansas Sentencing: Who Has the Burden, and When?

Jeremiah Kemper, Staff Editor State v. Roberts, No. 121,682, (Kan. Nov. 19, 2021) Issue: Under K.S.A. § 21-6814(c), when a defendant challenges the constitutionality of their prior convictions at or before their initial sentencing hearing, the State has …

The Criminal Restitution Statutes: Severing the Problematic Portions to Protect the Right to a Jury

Sarah Schmitz, Staff Editor State v. Arnette, No. 112,572, (Kan. Oct. 15, 2021). https://www.kscourts.org/KSCourts/media/KsCourts/Opinions/112572_3.pdf?ext=.pdf Issue: Under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-6604(b)(2) and Kan. Stat. Ann. § 22-3424(d)(1), criminal restitution shall be collected and enforced as a civil judgment …

Cumulative Error Analysis: Why Courts Need to Consider the Benefit Received by Opposing Party when Prejudicial Information is Presented

Stephany Rohleder, Staff Editor State v. Taylor, No. 118,792, (Kan. Oct. 8, 2021). https://www.kscourts.org/KSCourts/media/KsCourts/Opinions/118792_1.pdf?ext=.pdf Issue:  The Kansas Court of Appeals found five errors when Taylor appealed his criminal conviction.  Four errors were not reversible either collectively or individually.  …

DNA Testing: Important Enough for Extended Jurisdiction and Too Important to Wait for Final Sentencing

Author: Kat Girod, Staff Editor State v. Thurber, No. 122,739, (Kan. Aug. 13, 2021). Issue: Does Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-2512 extend a district court’s jurisdiction to consider a petition for DNA testing after the case has been …

Statutory Differences Not Mere Semantics in Jury Instructions

Author: Lexi Christopher, Staff Editor State v. Jones, No. 119,764, (Kan. August 6, 2021) Issue: Jones was convicted of four counts of sexual exploitation of a minor under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-5510.  Were the jury instructions clearly …

Absconding and Probation Revocation: Intent Requirements

Author: Dahnika Short, Comments Editor  State v. Dooley, No. 120,863 (Kan. July 23, 2021)  https://www.kscourts.org/KSCourts/media/KsCourts/Opinions/120863_1.pdf?ext=.pdf Issue: Did Dooley possess the requisite intent under K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 22-3716 to warrant revocation of probation rather than the imposition of intermediate sanctions after a pattern of …

House Bill No. 2071 — Expanding Protection for Minors against Stalking

Author: Betsy Donahue, Staff Editor House Bill No. 2071 amends Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-5427 to include additional protections for individuals under fourteen years old in Section 1(a)(4).  Stalking now includes an individual’s intentional behavior toward a child …

State v. Albano: Revisiting the Right to Have a Jury Consider Sentence-Enhancing Prior Convictions

Author: Dahnika Short, Staff Editor  State v. Albano, No. 120,767 (Kan. May 28, 2021)  Issue: Does Section 5 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights guarantee the right to have a jury determine the existence of sentence-enhancing prior convictions under the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines …

A Wrongful 226-Day Confinement and No Relief: The Impact of Distinguishing Juvenile Adjudications and Criminal Convictions

In re M.M., No. 121,936 (Kan. Mar. 12, 2021). Author: Chloe Ketchmark, Staff Editor Issue: Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-5004 provides relief for wrongfully convicted and imprisoned persons.  A magistrate judge wrongfully adjudicated and sentenced claimant M.M. to …

The Kansas Criminal Procedure Survey provides valuable insight into Kansas criminal procedure to Kansas practitioners. The University of Kansas Law Review publishes updates to the survey on the Kansas Criminal Procedure Blog, the online home for the survey. The Criminal Procedure Survey is a long-standing tradition of the KU School of Law and the Law Review.

We are proud to adapt the Criminal Procedure Survey into a new format that will provide timely updates to Kansas practitioners about new criminal law changes in Kansas and the 10th Circuit.